Nikola Tesla Free Energy

Nikola Tesla dreamed of free electricity. What happened?

Have you ever wondered what the world would be like if electricity was free?

We all recognize the name Tesla in the well-known trademark of entrepreneur Elon Musk and his electric cars, but what about Tesla, the man?

More than 100 years ago, Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) invented alternating current (AC), the polyphase alternating current system, which laid the foundation for today’s mass-produced power supply. 

Nikola Tesla, man or magician?

From the invention of the particle beam to radar, the electric car, robotics, and remote-controlled drones, Tesla mental-modelled solutions to problems with such clarity of mind that he could visualise the individual parts of a machine or mechanism in three dimensions. Then run simulations in his head and check for wear and tear.

He even pioneered interplanetary radio communication with Guglielmo Marconi. He

He later fell out with Marconi when the US Patent Office mysteriously overturned his patents and effectively credited Marconi with the invention of the radio; who was, in fact, using several of Tesla’s patents.  

Tesla was so far ahead of his time, the genius of many of his early inventions — used to develop the radio and television, fluorescent and induction lighting, and MRIs and X-rays –- only came to light after his death.

He dreamed of free electricity for all

Tesla’s long-held dream was to create a source of inexhaustible, clean energy that was free for everyone. He strongly opposed centralised coal-fired power stations that spewed carbon dioxide into the air that humans breathed.

Image: Matthew Henry, Unsplash

He believed that the Earth had “fluid electrical charges” running beneath its surface, that when interrupted by a series of electrical discharges at repeated set intervals, would generate a limitless power supply by generating immense low-frequency electrical waves.

One of Tesla’s most extraordinary experiments was to transmit electrical power over long distances without wires or cables — a feat that has baffled scientists ever since.

His grand vision was to free humankind from the burdens of extracting, pumping, transporting, and burning fossil fuels — which he viewed as “sinful waste”.

“Ignorant, unimaginative people, consumed by self-interest”

Tesla was eventually undone by what he called “ignorant, unimaginative people, consumed by self-interest”— powerful men that sought to protect the immensely profitable, low-tech industries they had spent a lifetime building.

Today’s fossil-fuel industry, a legacy of that past, has fought just as hard in recent decades to protect the same interests — Luddites and laggards afraid of losing their companies to the wind, sun, and zero point field.

A cohort of carbon-captured conspirators

The title of a new book by award-winning journalist Marian Wilkinson refers to the same cohort of carbon-captured conspirators as the Carbon Club: How a network of influential climate skeptics, politicians and business leaders fought to control climate policy.

“For decades our politicians have been fighting the climate wars fueled by the carbon club. But despite the political carnage, the science of climate change has not been defeated.”

The carbon club feared that the fossil-fueled economy would indeed come to an abrupt halt if coal became just the fossilized remnants of ancient plant life and nothing more.

In short: we rode on the horse’s back until the combustion engine, and we’re now supposed to ride on the back of a coal-fired power station until the resulting toxicity and global ecological imbalances make life so unhealthy as to become unbearable for all species and ecology, while the equally ignorant masses continue to be mesmerized and thus ruled by the spell of the economic oligarchy? How utterly unimaginative!

Climate change may very well be, among other things, the very real effect of a very long story of taking and not giving; which is itself a symptom of an unhealthy worldview, a distortion of the natural universal principles with an attempt at willfulness and control as separate from the unifying principle of love, or to identify as separate from the collective, be that genetically, morally, or in dogmatic belief.

So— coming back up to the tip of the iceberg— what’s the obsession with old-world technology and coal, as opposed to new renewables technology and new jobs, that seems to incite such lunacy? 

Technology has improved renewables

With the latest flexibility of pumped hydro, wind and solar, and the advent of commercial battery storage, running coal-fired power stations 24/7 should be relegated to the “too dumb basket”. 

The Tesla battery that is soon to be upgraded to 150 megawatts is a prime example of science and technology winning over political recalcitrance.

One market operator declared that it dispatched power faster than conventional power stations and was instrumental in pushing down energy prices

Not to mention the even “bigger benefit” —the main point— of reducing carbon emissions.

It might be cleaner, but will it be cheaper?

We may need to shift away from letting the familiar fear based belief systems define us, and begin to take responsibility for understanding and choosing how we want to invest in our life. We can start by defining and assigning our own value to renewables, rather than complain about the change.

In a capitalist-driven world, in which executive bonuses remain beholden to maximizing profits, will your electricity bill actually be lower if we switch to renewables?

Not likely if we as a collective sit back and allow history to repeat itself. But this is the day and age for making changes that will affect our life for generations to come.

Municipalities may find value in investing in their own utility or energy infrastructure, to rival big coms, such as in Boulder, CO, for example. And off grid living can invest in new tech for independent generators of all kinds. This is an evolving process of initiating choice for decentralized living. And it raises many questions of where independence meets the collective where governance or taxes are concerned.

As far as cost, if your energy still comes off the commercial grid, your electricity bill will have some hefty baggage attached. Infrastructure, the poles and wires, account for about half the cost on your electricity bill. Twenty-five per cent is the wholesale cost of the power itself, and the balance is consumed by the retailer’s profit margins and operating costs.

Oh, and you can add another 10 per cent to the bill for the excess voltage surging through the grid to your home. The allowable range is 216 to 253 volts, and the nominal voltage is around 230 but is often higher. Once again, fixing it is considered too costly.

So, unless you’re running your own rooftop solar system, a cheaper wholesale price courtesy of renewables might only amount to a few per cent.

And lest we forget, the already-aging original infrastructure can only get older and require more and more maintenance.

Tesla’s biggest mistake was that he cared more about the people than he did about the profit

John J. O’Neill wrote in his biography of Tesla:

“The panorama of human evolution is illumined by sudden bursts of dazzling brilliance in intellectual accomplishments that throw their beams far ahead to give us a glimpse of the distant future, that we may more correctly guide our wavering steps today.”

Just think, a man ahead of his time might have brought clean and free electricity to everyone, and averted dangerous climate change well before it had even begun. 

But unfortunately for Tesla, along with the natural world and all of us living today and the generations to come, JP Morgan and his other backers at the time saw his dream of free energy as a threat to their business model. In short: a threat to capitalism, through which they made their millions. 

Tesla was unable to secure any financial backing after JP Morgan pulled out, and shortly after he was declared bankrupt. 

Tesla, the genius, whose collective dream was thwarted by a narrow minded cohort, lived a humble existence in a New York apartment until his death in 1943.

But what would have the world been like if electricity was clean and fee for everyone? 

In the name of Tesla, may we continue to imaginatively and intelligently implement our collective dream for more equitable energy.

Adapted from The Fifth State

Magnetic Energy + Motors

Magnetic Energy: The Way the Universe Works

Michael Tellinger interviews magnetic engineer

Kevin Orlowski

The universe and all its components are held together by coherent resonance. This resonance presents itself in an infinite fractal structure of Toroidal magnetic fields – from infinitely small to infinitely large. These perfectly balanced magnetic toruses are the fundamental structure of everything in creation – the visible and invisible. 

 
unnamed.jpg

What is a Torus?

Torus or toroidal energy is a doughnut shape – like the energy field of the human heart/aura, and the many Torus (doughnut shape) stones in Michael Telliger’s museum in South Africa. They are all energy generating torsion fields. The expression "torsion fields" or "vortex energy" and "zero point energy" – all refer to Toroidal energy.


How A Magnetic Toroidal Field is Generated

toroidal + poloidal fields.jpg
 

Here, Michael Tellinger interviews magnetic engineer Kevin Orlowski:

Kevin Orlowski is one of the world experts in Magnetic energy and how we can use this universal force for the benefit of humanity. Kevin’s father and his business partner Rory Johnson developed a permanent energy magnet motor in the 70’s. It was set to replace dirty fossil fuels with zero exhaust. However, shortly after showing it to Greyhound Bus company, Rory was killed and Kevin’s father was threatened and told to stop. Their labs were raided and all was destroyed and confiscated.

Along with Nikola Tesla, similar stories have surfaced for decades or more — of engineers, scientists, teachers, doctors, and others whose sustainable technology, holistic health care, or education that would align our way of living with universal ‘natural law’ has all ended up being destroyed and their inventors defamed, threatened, or killed.

All the information and inspiration ever needed for us to live sustainably and holistically with the earth and all inhabitants, as well as to relate directly with far more advanced beings, is openly available. We must ask ourselves what is really going on…

Join Michael Tellinger’s VIDEO Channel for hundreds of hours of videos, interviews, lectures, presentations and ongoing research and discovery – as it is made – every week. Look out for his upcoming lecture series on Toroidal fields and energy of creation. 

Click the linkhttps://michaeltellinger.vhx.tv/

MORE MAGNETIC MOTOR + TORUS RELATED ENGINEERING

 
crop circles as blueprints.jpg
 
 

Holistic Environment vs New Tech

Simple Permaculture Design Over Complex Technological Solutions

Another Rant on How the World Might Actually Get Closer to Sustainable Living

Permaculture Research Institute

by Jonathon Engels

When I talk about sustainable living, by no means here do I mean to bash technology. Point of fact, I make part of my living writing online, a career that didn’t even really exist when I was plodding through an English degree. For that matter, 95% or more of my research happens online as well. And, last week I wrote an article about the nickel iron batteries my wife Emma and I are going to use with our solar array. I drive a truck to my other job (gardening) and have been known to use cordless power tools from time to time. In other words, I recognize real value in technology.

All that said, as the innovative green movement continues to gain ground, I find myself concerned that new solutions are being centered around future problems.


  • Compostable and bio-based plastics have become all the rage for the environmentally concerned consumer looking for a bottle of water or soda. But, these plastics may be worse than the old stuff. For one, they are compostable when the appropriate industrial facility is around to process them, a process that requires lots of heat and energy, which undoubtedly is not ecologically sourced. Otherwise, these plastics can’t be recycled, and they end up in the landfill or ocean.

  • Similarly, I continually see natural gas touted as “clean energy” because burning it doesn’t create the same CO2 pollution as other fossil fuels, but of course, the fracking required to acquire it is every bit as horrible. Fracking releases fugitive methane into the atmosphere, worse than CO2, and it heavily draws from and irreversibly damages fresh water sources. There’s also a lot to suggest it’s doing some serious damage beneath the surface.

download.jpg

Rather than getting too mired in the flaws of the many possibly well-intentioned “green” efforts, a la corn-derived biofuels or lab-grown meats, suffice it to say that the real problem seems to be a defiant resistance against the obvious answer: We need to change how we are living. This isn’t to say never use technology, but more so, it’s an effort to gain perspective on what we are doing as opposed to what we are buying. Spending our money on greener products is worthwhile, but it’s not going to fix the earth’s problems so much as prolong them.

A Better Design Leads Towards Sustainable Living

While cleaner energy is great, the more relevant line would be less reliance on electricity and fossil fuels. While bio-plastics may have potential in the rapidly approaching post-petroleum age, the answer would be less plastic packaging and while renewable bio-gas is useful, it’s no reason to grow more monoculture fields of corn. We should be moving away from that. The effort has been to maintain all the conveniences of the contemporary lifestyle rather than recognise the lifestyle itself is the flaw.

Pursuing simplistic solutions—sustainability by design—would make a much more positive difference for the planet than constantly rearranging our products to address the latest acknowledged catastrophe. However, the practical solutions don’t come without sacrificing some of the extravagance with which we’ve become accustomed, and they may require a different effort on our part. It could mean a life without electrified everything. It could mean waiting at a bus station. It could mean growing gardens instead of lawns.

Permaculture Solutions

Rather than always banking on technology reinventing a greener version of the creature comforts, permaculture first focuses on finding simple designs to supply our needs. The examples are plentiful:

  • Solar hot water heaters use the sun rather than electricity or fossil fuels to heat our water. However, they might require showering at certain times of day (or the week) in order to have them work properly.

  • Biodigesters for clean cooking fuels not only provide free energy, but also they deal with “waste” products like manure and food scraps. Of course, this would mean maintaining the bio-digester as opposed to endless grid-fed electricity or gas lines for cooking.

  • Passive solar heating/cooling can drastically reduce the amount of energy needed to heat and cool a home. But, they do require orienting our homes according to the planet rather than the street or our neighbours.

  • Geothermal cooling makes a lot more sense than air conditioning. Installing underground earth tubes costs less than a decent air conditioner, and there are no electric bills to pay thereafter. Plus, the geothermal air is cooler than where most would put the thermostat. That said, the temperature can’t be adjusted to particular tastes.

  • Rocket stove thermal mass heaters are efficient wood-burning stoves that can be run off of small diameter wood, at which time they could be designed to use for cooking, heating water, and heating the home. The stove design burns the wood fuel so completely very little smoke is even produced. Now, there’s wood to gather.

  • Greywater irrigation systems, along with a good mulching regiment, sensible earthworks, and garden placement could all but eliminate the need to pump freshwater anywhere. Plus, our grey-water could be naturally filtered rather than chemically cleaned with black-water. These grey- water systems require monitoring and plants.

  • Composting toilets, speaking of black-water, could hugely reduce our freshwater usage as well as provide fertiliser for sustainable food, timber, and resource-producing forests. At the same time, we’d be reducing a crappy situation for the planet: sewage. For it to work, though, we have to handle the compost as opposed to flush and forget.

  • Perennial food forests combine plants and animals into productive ecosystems that both serve the planet and people. Food comes without chemical inputs to fertilise it or chemical pesticides and herbicides to protect it. Wildlife and domesticated animals get first-rate habitat. However, the harvest from a food forest isn’t as predictable as a chemically controlled corn field.

images.jpg

In other words, permaculture has lots of solutions for the environmental issues the world is facing while providing for our basic needs (and then some), but most of them rely on people being malleable enough to accept new ways of doing things, putting in the effort to live greener as opposed to buy greener. When green choices aren’t sold as products, each individual must live differently to effect change, but the results actually do equate to something better for the environment.

 

Appropriate Technology

In short, earth’s environmental woes are inevitably increased by the ever-growing economy upon which modern lifestyles revolve, including an endless array of guilt-free eco-products. Green dreams are being sold to us: caught up in convenient, doused in the disposable, and tempted by extraneous technology. We are lulled into maintaining lifestyles that have betrayed us with streamed sedentary entertainment, social media advertising for fruitless online shopping, and subpar nutrition from thousands of miles away. Industrialised humanity has taken advantage of the planet’s hospitality, and we are being lied to with new playthings to justify bad habits.

However, the answers are not complicated, and the solutions have real purpose. They are the ingredients to a fulfilling life. Some of us have linked healthy habits to gym memberships and organic food, but all of that exercise and activity could come from more productive pursuits, like growing that organic food, turning the compost that fertilises it, climbing an apple tree to prune it, walking to work, chopping firewood, or any other number of things provide an experience and outcome far more rewarding than running on a treadmill. The answers are not complex technological solutions. They are practical and cost nothing.

When we expend our energy this way, living green—the permaculture lifestyle—as opposed to buying green—the consumerist lifestyle, there is less and less need to fret over food miles, ply ourselves with plastic packaging, or exercise on electrified equipment. When convenience is curbed little by little, we transition into a truly active life in which the things we do provide the things we need. Designing our days this way, designing our homes this way, will move us much closer to sustainability than another app for tracking where our food was sourced or improved version of the light bulb.

Technology is something we can use to help us get there. It is not necessarily the means by which we live green.


tech+green living.jpg